4.6 Article

Dexmedetomidine infusion for more than 24 hours in critically ill patients: sedative and cardiovascular effects

Journal

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 2188-2196

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-004-2417-z

Keywords

dexmedetomidine; sedatives; intensive care unit; analgesics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the potential of dexmedetomidine for targeted sedation in complex Intensive Care (ICU) patients for >24 h. Design: Prospective, open label, clinical trial. Setting: Tertiary general ICU. Patients: Twenty critically ill patients, mean APACHE II 23(+/-9). Interventions: A continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine, median infusion time 71.5 (35-168) h, starting at 0.4 mug.kg.h without a loading dose and adjusted (0.2-0.7 mug.kg.h) to a target Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) of 2-4. Rescue midazolam and/or morphine/fentanyl were given as clinically indicated. Measurements and results: Haemodynamic parameters and RSSs were collected until 24 h after cessation. An RSS 2-5 was achieved in 1,147 (83%) of observations with a reduction in RSS of 6 from 13% in the first 6 h to 3% between 18 h and 24 h. Sixteen patients needed minimal or no additional midazolam, median 4 mg/day (0.5-10) and ten required minimal or no additional analgesia, median 2 mg/day (0.5-4.5), 55 mug/day (14-63) of morphine/fentanyl. Results: A 16% reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 21% reduction in heart rate (HR) occurred over the first 4 h followed by minimal (+/-10%) changes throughout the infusion. A rise in SBP was observed in two patients. After abrupt cessation, SBP and HR monitored for 24 It rose by 7% and 11%, respectively. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine was an effective sedative and analgesic sparing drug in critically ill patients when used without a loading dose for longer than 24 h with predictable falls in blood pressure and HR. There was no evidence of cardiovascular rebound 24 h after abrupt cessation of infusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available