4.7 Article

Duration of immunosuppressive treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 104, Issue 12, Pages 3501-3506

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0200

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA15704, CA18029] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL36444] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI33484] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) requires long-term immunosuppressive therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 751 patients with chronic GVHD to identify characteristics associated with the duration of immunosuppressive treatment. Among the 274 patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy after resolution of chronic GVHD before recurrent malignancy or death, the median duration of treatment was 23 months. Results of a multivariable model showed that treatment was prolonged in patients who received peripheral blood cells, in male patients with female donors, in those with graft-versus-host HLA mismatching, and in those with hyperbilirubinemia or multiple sites affected by chronic GHVD at the onset of the disease. Nonrelapse mortality was increased among patients with HLA mismatching or hyperbilirubinemia but not among those with other risk factors associated with prolonged treatment for chronic GVHD. Nonrelapse mortality was also increased in older patients and those with older donors, in patients with platelet counts less than 100000/muL or progressive onset of chronic GVHD from acute GVHD, and in those receiving higher doses of prednisone immediately before the diagnosis of chronic GVHD. After the dose of prednisone was taken into account, progressive onset was not associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality. (C) 2004 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available