4.5 Article

Capillary electrophoretic and micellar electrokinetic separations of asymmetric dimethyl-L-arginine and structurally related amino acids: Quantitation in human plasma

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 17-18, Pages 1483-1490

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200401918

Keywords

capillary electrophoresis; micellar electrokinetic chromatography; dimethyl-L-arginine; amino acids

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL-63685] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI 50153] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the development of efficient electrophoretic methods for the separation and quantification of L-arginine and six naturally occurring derivatives that are structurally and functionally related. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) employing a concentrated borate buffer at pH 9.4 achieves the separation of mixtures containing dimethyl-L-arginine, N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine, L-arginine, L-homoarginine, L-ornithine, and L-arginine, citrulline as 4-fluoro-7-nitrobenzofurazan derivatives. In addition, the separation of the isomeric dimethyl-L-arginine derivatives (symmetric and asymmetric) is attained with baseline resolution by micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) when a high concentration of deoxycholic acid is added as a surfactant to the same running buffer. The influence of buffer type, concentration, and pH on the separation was studied to optimize separation conditions. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for asymmetric dimethyl-L-arginine in aqueous solution was determined to be 20 muM using UV absorption in a CE separation and 0.1 muM using laser induced fluorescence (LIF) detection in an MEKC separation. This newly developed method was successfully applied for the quantitation of asymmetric dimethyl-L-arginine and L-arginine in human plasma samples at levels that might be used as a clinical diagnostic for cardiovascular disease (0.125 muM LOQ).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available