4.6 Article

CD4+ CD25+ T cells regulate vaccine-generated primary and memory CD8+ T-cell responses against herpes simplex virus type 1

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 23, Pages 13082-13089

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13082-13089.2004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 14981, R01 AI014981, AI 46462, R01 AI046462] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has become evident that naturally occurring CD25(+) regulatory T cells (T-reg cells) not only influence self-antigen specific immune response but also dampen foreign antigen specific immunity. This report extends our previous findings by demonstrating that immunity to certain herpes simplex virus (HSV) vaccines is significantly elevated and more effective if T-reg cell response is curtailed during either primary or recall immunization. The data presented here show that removal of CD25(+) T-reg cells prior to SSIEFARL-CpG or gB-DNA immunization significantly enhanced the resultant CD8(+) T-cell response to the immunodominant SSIEFARL peptide. The enhanced CD8(+) T-cell reactivity in T-reg cell-depleted animals was between two- and threefold and evident in both acute and memory stages. Interestingly, removal of CD25(+) T-reg cells during the memory recall response to plasmid immunization resulted in a twofold increase in CD8(+) T-cell memory pool. Moreover, in the challenge experiments, memory CD8(+) T cells generated with plasmid DNA in the absence of T-reg cells cleared the virus more effectively compared with control groups. We conclude that CD25(+) T-reg cells quantitatively as well as qualitatively affect the memory CD8(+) T-cell response generated by gB-DNA vaccination against HSV. However, it remains to be seen if all types of vaccines against HSV are similarly affected by CD25(+) T-reg cells and if it is possible to devise means of limiting T-reg cell activity to enhance vaccine efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available