Journal
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 841-853Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pds.969
Keywords
propensity score; logistic regression; observational studies; confounding; bias; methods
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose To document which established criteria for logistic regression modeling researchers consider when using propensity scores in observational studies. Methods We performed a systematic review searching Medline and Science Citation to identify observational studies published in 2001 that addressed clinical questions using propensity score methods to adjust for treatment assignment. We abstracted aspects of propensity score model development (e.g. variable selection criteria, continuous variables included in correct functional form, interaction inclusion criteria), model discrimination and goodness of fit for 47 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results We found few studies reporting on the propensity score model development or evaluation of model fit. Conclusions Reporting of aspects related to propensity score model development is limited and raises questions about the value of these principles in developing propensity scores from which unbiased treatment effects are estimated. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available