4.7 Article

Chemical proteomic analysis reveals alternative modes of action for pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine kinase inhibitors

Journal

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages 1181-1193

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M400124-MCP200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small molecule inhibitors belonging to the pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine class of compounds were developed as antagonists of protein tyrosine kinases implicated in cancer progression. Derivatives from this compound class are effective against most of the imatinib mesylate-resistant BCR-ABL mutants isolated from advanced chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Here, we established an efficient proteomics method employing an immobilized pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine ligand as an affinity probe and identified more than 30 human protein kinases affected by this class of compounds. Remarkably, in vitro kinase assays revealed that the serine/threonine kinases Rip-like interacting caspase-like apoptosis-regulatory protein kinase (RICK) and p38alpha were among the most potently inhibited kinase targets. Thus, pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidines did not discriminate between tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases. Instead, we found that these inhibitors are quite selective for protein kinases possessing a conserved small amino acid residue such as threonine at a critical site of the ATP binding pocket. We further demonstrated inhibition of both p38 and RICK kinase activities in intact cells upon pyrido[2,3-d] pyrimidine inhibitor treatment. Moreover, the established functions of these two kinases as signal transducers of inflammatory responses could be correlated with a potent in vivo inhibition of cytokine production by a pyrido[ 2,3- d] pyrimidine compound. Thus, our data demonstrate the utility of proteomic methods employing immobilized kinase inhibitors for identifying new targets linked to previously unrecognized therapeutic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available