4.7 Article

γ-Hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and γ-aminobutyric acidB receptor (GABABR) binding sites are distinctive from one another:: molecular evidence

Journal

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 1146-1156

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.08.019

Keywords

epilepsy; GABA receptor; gamma-hydroxybutyric acid; ligand binding; gene transfection

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 40270] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) is thought to be a weak partial agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acidB Receptor (GABA(B)R), but the precise relationship of the GHB receptor (GHBR) to the GABA(B)R remains unclear. In order to test the hypothesis that the GHBR is not identical to the GABA(B)R, we conducted two groups of experiments. First, GABA(B)R subtype 1 (R1) and/or subtype 2 (R2) were over expressed in HEK 293 cells and membrane binding studies on the transfected cells done using [3 H]GHB and [H-3] (2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen-6-ylidene) ethanoic acid ([H-3]NCS-382). The latter is a specific antagonist at the GHB binding site. Second, [H-3]GHB and [H-3]NCS-382 autoradiographic binding studies were done on the brains of mice in which the gene for GABA(B)R1a was deleted. Such mice do not have a functioning GABA(B)R. There was no detectable specific [H-3]GHB or [H-3]NCS-382 binding in HEK 293 cells transfected with GABA(B)R1, R2. or R1/R2. Binding to [H-3]CGP54626A, a high affinity GABA(B)R antagonist, was absent in GABA(B)R1a(-/-) mice. There was no difference in [H-3]NCS-382 binding observed in the brains of GABA(B)R1a(-/-), GABA(B)R1a(+/-) or GABA(B)R1a(+/+) mice. Specific [H-3]GHB binding was observed in the brain of GABA(B)R1a(-/-) mice but was significantly lower than in wild type mice. These data support the hypothesis that the GHB binding site is separate and distinct from the GABABR. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available