4.7 Article

Inferior olive oscillations gate transmission of motor cortical activity to the cerebellum

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 24, Issue 50, Pages 11356-11367

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-04.2004

Keywords

oscillator; complex spike; Purkinje cell; cerebellum; motor cortex; gating

Categories

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37028, R01 NS037028-06, R01 NS037028] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inferior olivary (IO) neurons display spontaneous oscillatory activity, yet the importance of these oscillations for shaping the responses of this system to its afferents is uncertain. We used multiple electrode recording of crus 2a Purkinje cell complex spikes (CSs) in ketamine-xylazine-anesthetized rats to investigate olivocerebellar responses to activation of motor cortico-olivary pathways. Trains of electrical stimuli were applied to the motor cortex at frequencies between 4 and 30 Hz. Various frequency-response curves were observed, with the most common types being unimodal with a maximum at 9.5+/-2.3 Hz and bimodal with peaks at 8.9+/-1.0 and 15.1+/-1.3 Hz. To determine whether IO oscillatory properties underlie the resonance peaks in the frequency-response curves, apamin and charybdotoxin were injected into the IO. These toxins, which weaken and enhance spontaneous IO oscillations, respectively, had corresponding effects on the sharpness of resonance peaks. Next, the variation of CS entrainment patterns with frequency was investigated to characterize the nature of the IO oscillator. Low-frequency (4 Hz) stimulation was relatively ineffective in entraining CS activity. Between 4 and 30 Hz, two predominant entrainment patterns emerged. For low-frequency (4-6 Hz) and high-frequency (17-30 Hz) ranges, a 1: 2 entrainment dominated, whereas in the intermediate range (6-17 Hz), 1: 1 entrainment was most prevalent. These results indicate that IO neurons respond as nonlinear oscillators to afferent signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available