4.7 Article

The constancy of upper mantle fO2 through time inferred from V/Sc ratios in basalts

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 228, Issue 3-4, Pages 483-493

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.10.006

Keywords

vanadium; scandium; oxygen; fugacity; mantle; atmosphere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The geochemical behaviors of V and Sc during partial melting are more similar to each other than to most other elements but in detail, the partitioning of V is redox-sensitive whereas that of Sc is not. The V/Sc ratio in basalts is shown here to be a sensitive and robust recorder of the oxygen fugacity (00,) of their mantle source regions. The use of V/Sc ratios differs from the use of V and/or Cr elemental systematics in basalts because the latter, strictly speaking, provide information on the fO(2) of the erupted magma and not necessarily that of the mantle source. V/Sc ratios on the other hand can see through magmatic differentiation processes, such as olivine crystallization, and therefore,. provide a better memory of the fO(2) of the mantle. The W Sc ratios of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORBs) are shown here to average 6.74 +/- 1.11 (1sigma), which constrains the fO(2) of the modern mantle to roughly 0.3 +/- 0.5 (1sigma) log units below the fayalite-magnetite-quatrz (FMQ) buffer. Archean basalts (up to 3.5 Ga) are shown to have identical V/Sc ratios (6.34 +/- 0.62, 1sigma) to within error indicating that the fO(2) of the mantle source to Archean basalts differ from that of modem convecting mantle by no more than 0.3 log unit. The constraints based on V/Sc systematics represent an improvement on studies using V or Cr elemental systematics. which constrain the fO(2) of Archean and modem mantles to be identical, but only to within 0.5 to 1 log unit. These observations show that there has been fit-tic or no secular evolution of the fO(2) of the upper mantle, at least since the early Archean. (C)2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available