4.8 Article

Passive-sampler derived air concentrations of persistent organic pollutants on a north-south transect in Chile

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 24, Pages 6529-6537

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es049065i

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive air samplers consisting of polyurethane foam (PUF) disks, were deployed in six locations in Chile along a north-south transect to investigate gas-phase concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). The study provides new information on air concentrations of these persistent organic pollutants (POPs) which is lacking in this region. It also provides insight into potential sources and long-range transport (LRT). The samplers were deployed for a 2-month period in five remote sites and one site in the city of Concepcion. Mean concentrations (pg m(-3)) for SigmaPCB were 4.7 +/- 2.7 at remote sites and 53 +/- 13 in Concepcion. PCB levels at remote sites were related to proximity to urban source regions and/or air back trajectories. With the exception of endosulfan I, mean concentrations (pg m(-3)) of OCPs at background sites were consistently low: 5.4 +/- 1.4 for alpha-HCH, 7.0 +/- 1.1 for gamma-HCH, 2.5 +/- 0.5 for TC, 2.5 +/- 0.6 for CC, 1.9 +/- 1.2 for dieldrin, and less than 3.5 for toxaphene. Endosulfan I showed a decreasing concentration gradient from 99 to 3.5 pg m(-3) from the north to south of Chile. Concentrations of OCPs in the Concepcion City were generally 10-20 times higher than at the background sites suggesting continued usage and/or re-emission from past use. For instance, at remote sites, the alpha/gamma ratio (0.76) was; typical of background air, while the ratio in Concepcion (0.12) was consistent with fresh use of gamma-HCH. Levels of SigmaPBDEs were below the detection limit of 6 pg m(-3) at all sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available