4.7 Article

A physically based model of the effects of forest roads on slope stability

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004WR003238

Keywords

anthropogenic effects; forest roads; hillslope hydrology; runoff and streamflow; shallow landsliding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Road networks in mountainous forest landscapes have the potential to increase the susceptibility to shallow landsliding by altering subsurface flow paths. In this paper a road interception/rerouting grid-based model is developed and coupled with a hydrogeomechanical, threshold-based model for slope instability. Model results allow quantification of the influence of roads on shallow landsliding hazard across a landscape and generation of hypotheses about the broader geomorphic effect of roads. The model is applied to three sites in northeastern Italy to study the influence of three different procedures for upslope drainage area computation on model results. The three procedures are a single-flow direction procedure (D8), a multiple-flow direction procedure (MF), and an algorithm based on proportioning flow between two downslope pixels (DINF). Model results are highly sensitive to upslope drainage area algorithm choice. It is shown that D8 and MF are unsuitable for road impact evaluation due to grid bias (D8) and excessive dispersion (MF). Model implementation with the DINF procedure results in a reasonable compromise between the artifacts that characterize the other two algorithms. Observed landslide patterns are broadly consistent with model estimates, a finding that underscores the utility of this simple approach for predicting the geomorphic effects of forest roads constructed on steep slopes. The approach used in this study may be useful for defining criteria for road design that reduce the effects of roads on geomorphic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available