4.8 Article

Bioluminescence imaging of individual fibroblasts reveals persistent, independently phased circadian rhythms of clock gene expression

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages 2289-2295

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.057

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH051573, MH51573, K08 MH067657] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circadian (ca. 24 hr) oscillations in expression of mammalian clock genes are found not only in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the central circadian pacemaker, but also in peripheral tissues [1]. Under constant conditions in vitro, however, rhythms of peripheral tissue explants [2] or immortalized cells [3] damp partially or completely. It is unknown whether this reflects an inability of peripheral cells to sustain rhythms, as SCN neurons can, or a loss of synchrony among cells. Using bioluminescence imaging of Rat-1 fibroblasts transfected with a Bmal1:luc plasmid and primary fibroblasts dissociated from mPer2(Luciferase-SV40) knockin mice, we monitored single-cell circadian rhythms of clock gene expression for 1-2 weeks. We found that single fibroblasts can oscillate robustly and independently with undiminished amplitude and diverse circadian periods. Cells were partially synchronized by medium changes at the start of an experiment, but due to different intrinsic periods, their phases became randomly distributed after several days. Closely spaced cells in the same culture did not have similar phases, implying a lack of functional coupling among cells. Thus, like SCN neurons, single fibroblasts can function as independent circadian oscillators; however, lack of oscillator coupling in dissociated cell cultures leads to a loss of synchrony among individual cells and damping of the ensemble rhythm at the population level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available