4.7 Article

Longitudinal study of Salmonella species in 90 Alberta swine finishing, farms

Journal

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 47-56

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.10.005

Keywords

Salmonella; swine; farm environment; serovars

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to determine the farm prevalence of Sahmonella in 90 Alberta finishing swine farms over a 5-month period, to evaluate Salmonella distribution in the farm environment and to describe Salmonella serovar diversity on these farms. Ten veterinary practitioners selected 90 Alberta swine farms based on an annual production of greater than or equal to2000 market pigs per farm and the willingness of the producers to participate in the study. Between May and September 2000, twenty samples were collected from finishing swine and the environment of each farm. The annual production of selected farms represented approximately 25% of the mark-et swine production in Alberta. Participating farms were geographically representative of major swine production areas in Alberta. Sixty (66.1%) farms had at least one Salmonella-positive sample, with confidence interval (CI) of 57.1-77.2%. Salmonella were detected in 14.3% of fecal and 20.1% of environmental samples. The number of Sahnonella-positive samples per farm ranged from 1 to 19. Among environmental samples. Salmonella were most frequently recovered from boots (38.6%) and the main drain Twenty-two serovars were detected on the 60 Sahnonella-positive farms. Serovars Typhimurium (78 isolates), Derby (71 isolates) and Infantis (47 isolates) were the most common. A single serovar was detected on 58 farms, while 2, 3 and >3 serovars were detected on 15, 10 and 7 farms. respectively. The Salmonella farm status changed frequently over the 5-month period indicating the dynamic nature of Salmonella infections on these farms. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available