4.8 Article

Risk of fracture after androgen deprivation for prostate cancer

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 352, Issue 2, Pages 154-164

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041943

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [R24HS51161] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P50CA12385, P50 CA105631-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG024832] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The use of androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer has increased substantially over the past 15 years. This treatment is associated with a loss of bone-mineral density, but the risk of fracture after androgen-deprivation therapy has not been well studied. Methods: We studied the records of 50,613 men who were listed in the linked database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and Medicare as having received a diagnosis of prostate cancer in the period from 1992 through 1997. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of any fracture and the occurrence of a fracture resulting in hospitalization. Cox proportional-hazards analyses were adjusted for characteristics of the patients and the cancer, other cancer treatment received, and the occurrence of a fracture or the diagnosis of osteoporosis during the 12 months preceding the diagnosis of cancer. Results: Of men surviving at least five years after diagnosis, 19.4 percent of those who received androgen-deprivation therapy had a fracture, as compared with 12.6 percent of those not receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (P<0.001). In the Cox proportional-hazards analyses, adjusted for characteristics of the patient and the tumor, there was a statistically significant relation between the number of doses of gonadotropin-releasing hormone received during the 12 months after diagnosis and the subsequent risk of fracture. Conclusions: Androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer increases the risk of fracture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available