4.7 Article

Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene Val/Met functional polymorphism and risk of schizophrenia: A large-scale association study plus meta-analysis

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 139-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.018

Keywords

association; catechol-O-methyltransferase; meta-analysis; schizophrenia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A common functional polymorphism (Val/Met) in the catechol-O-methyltransferse gene (COMT) that markedly affects enzyme activity has been shown to affect executive cognition and the physiology of the prefrontal cortex in humans. It is hypothesized that the high activity Val allele slightly increases risk for schizophrenia through its effect on dopamine-mediated prefrontal information processing. Methods: We compared the allele/genotype frequencies of the Val/Met polymorphisms in a large independent patient-control sample (862 patient and 928 healthy control subjects) from Han Chinese population, and an update meta-analysis was performed to assess the collective evidence across individual studies. Results: No statistically significant differences were found ina llele or genotype frequencies between patient and normal control subjects, although a nonsignificant overrepresentation of the Val allele in schizophrenia patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09 95% confidence interval [CI] = .94-1.26) was suggested . Comparatively, the meta-analysis of all published population-based association studies showed statistically significant evidence for heterogeneity among the group of studies. Stratification of the studies by ethnicity of the samples yielded no significant evidence for an association with the Val allele in Asian population (OR = .96, 95% CI = .85-1.09), nor in European population (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = .95-1.19). Conclusions: Our data provide minimal evidence that the Val allele is a susceptibility factor for schizophrenia in either European or Asian populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available