4.7 Article

Modulation of effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 533-538

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.038

Keywords

fMRI; path analysis; effective connectivity; multiple sclerosis; working memory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

fMRI and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to study effective connectivity inside the working memory network in patients at the earliest stage of multiple sclerosis (MS), while performing paced auditory, serial addition test (PASAT), a sensitive task to reveal subtle cognitive impairments related to working memory and information speed processing. The path model used for SEM included bilateral connections between left and right BA 46, left and right BA 40, left and right anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), left BA 44 and left BA 40, right BA 44 and right BA 40, and unidirectional ipsilateral connections from BA 46 to BA 44, front ACC to BA 46, and from ACC to BA 44. Experimental data from the two groups fit accurately the working memory model, in patients [X-(20)(2) = 13, P = 0.877] as well as in controls [X-(20)(2) = 13.54, P = 0.853]. The omnibus test indicated a significant difference of model fits in patients and in controls [X((2)(40)) = 160.07, P < 0.0001]. Connectivity strengths from right BA 46 to left BA 46, front left ACC to left BA 46 were lower in patients than in controls, and higher front right ACC to right BA 46, front left to right and from right to left ACC (stacked model). Effective connectivity inside the working memory network appears altered in patients at the earliest stage of MS. Modulation of effective connectivity is present in patients inside the executive subsvsterns of working memory, and could be related to adaptive cognitive control processes that may limit the clinical manifestation of MS. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available