4.7 Article

Evaluation of ER, PgR, HER-2 and Ki-67 as predictors of response to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for operable breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages 147-155

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602256

Keywords

breast cancer; chemotherapy response; ER; HER-2/neu; Ki-67; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; PgR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary systemic therapy (PST) for operable breast cancer enables the identification of in vivo biological markers that predict response to treatment. A total of 118 patients with T2 - 4 N0 - 1 M0 primary breast cancer received six cycles of anthracycline-based PST. Clinical and radiological response was assessed before and after treatment using UICC criteria. A grading system to score pathological response was devised. Diagnostic biopsies and postchemotherapy surgical specimens were stained for oestrogen ( ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor, HER-2 and cell proliferation (Ki-67). Clinical, radiological and pathological response rates were 78, 72 and 38%, respectively. There was a strong correlation between ER and PgR staining (P<0.0001). Higher Ki-67 proliferation indices were associated with PgR - tumours ( median 28.3%, PgR+ 22.9%; P = 0.042). There was no relationship between HER-2 and other biological markers. No single pretreatment or postchemotherapy biological parameter predicted response by any modality of assessment. In all, 10 tumours changed hormone receptor classification after chemotherapy ( three ER, seven PgR); HER-2 staining changed in nine cases. Median Ki-67 index was 24.9% before and 18.1% after treatment ( P = 0.02); the median reduction in Ki-67 index after treatment was 21.2%. Tumours displaying 475% reduction in Ki-67 after chemotherapy were more likely to achieve a pathological response (77.8 vs 26.7%, P = 0.004).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available