4.8 Article

Discharge education improves clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 179-185

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151811.53450.B8

Keywords

heart failure; patients; trials; patient education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - Although interventions combining patient education and postdischarge management have demonstrated benefits in patients with chronic heart failure, the benefit attributable to patient education alone is not known. We hypothesized that a patient discharge education program would improve clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods and Results - We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of 223 systolic heart failure patients and compared the effects of a 1-hour, one-on-one teaching session with a nurse educator to the standard discharge process. Subjects were contacted by telephone at 30, 90, and 180 days to collect information about clinical events, symptoms, and self-care practices. The primary end point of the study was the total number of days hospitalized or dead in the 180-day follow-up period. Subjects randomized to receive the teaching session (n = 107) had fewer days hospitalized or dead in the follow-up period (0 and 10 days, median and 75th percentiles) than did controls (n = 116, 4 and 19 days; P = 0.009). Patients receiving the education intervention had a lower risk of rehospitalization or death ( relative risk, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.93; P = 0.018). Costs of care, including the cost of the intervention, were lower in patients receiving the education intervention than in control subjects by $2823 per patient ( P = 0.035). Conclusions - The addition of a 1-hour, nurse educator - delivered teaching session at the time of hospital discharge resulted in improved clinical outcomes, increased self-care measure adherence, and reduced cost of care in patients with systolic heart failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available