4.7 Review

Improving the orbital-free density functional theory description of covalent materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.1834563

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The essential challenge in orbital-free density functional theory (OF-DFT) is to construct accurate kinetic energy density functionals (KEDFs) with general applicability (i.e., transferability). During the last decade, several linear-response (LR)-based KEDFs have been proposed. Among them, the Wang-Govind-Carter (WGC) KEDF, containing a density-dependent response kernel, is one of the most accurate that still affords a linear scaling algorithm. For nearly-free-electron-like metals such as A1 and its alloys, OF-DFT employing the WGC KEDF produces bulk properties in good agreement with orbital-based Kohn-Sham (KS) DFT predictions. However, when OF-DFT, using the WGC KEDF combined with a recently proposed bulk-derived local pseudopotential (BLPS), was applied to semiconducting and metallic phases of Si, problems arose with convergence of the self-consistent density and energy, leading to poor results. Here we provide evidence that the convergence problem is very likely caused by the use of a truncated. Taylor series expansion of the WGC response kernel. Moreover, we show that a defect in the ansatz for the first-order reduced density matrix underlying the LR KEDFs limits the accuracy of these KEDFs. By optimizing the two free parameters involved in the WGC KEDF, the two-body Fermi wave vector mixing parameter gamma and the reference density rho(*) used in the Taylor expansion, OF-DFT calculations with the BLPS can achieve semiquantitative results for nine phases of bulk silicon. These new parameters are recommended whenever the WGC KEDF is used to study nonmetallic systems. (C) 2005 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available