4.5 Article

A capillary liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric method for the quantification of γ-aminobutyric acid in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.10.046

Keywords

gamma-aminobutyric acid; GABA; capillary liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry; cerebral spinal fluid; plasma

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [G12RR13459] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [S06GM08047] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS44177] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive and reliable method for the determination of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a major inhibitory neurotransmitter, in human plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been developed. The method is based on capillary liquid chromatography (LC)/tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) using deuterium-labeled GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid-2,2-D-2, GABA-d(2)) as internal standard. Pre-column derivatization with 7-fluoro-4-nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD-F) was deployed, allowing both effective in-line pre-concentration and sensitive tandem MS detection of the analyte. An extraction column (10 mm x 0.25 mm, 7 mum, C-18) was used for preconcentrating and stacking the sample. Separation was carried out on an analytical column (50 mm x 0.25 mm, 5 mum, C-18). Characteristic precursor-to-product ion transitions, m/z 267 --> 249 (for NBD-GABA) and m/z 269 --> 251 (for NBD-GABA-d(2)) were monitered for the quantification. A linear calibration curve from 10 to 250 ng/mL GABA with an r(2) value of 0.9994 was obtained. Detection limit was estimated to be 5.00 ng/mL GABA (S/N = 3). Human plasma and CSF samples were analyzed. The concentrations of GABA were found to be 98.6 +/- 33.9 ng/mL (mean +/- S.D., n = 12), and 44.3 +/- 10.0 ng/mL (n = 6) in plasma and CSF, respectively. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available