4.7 Review

The role of aromatization in testosterone supplementation - Effects on cognition in older men

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 290-296

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149639.25136.CA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-00037] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K01 AG00858] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the contribution of conversion of testosterone ( T) to estradiol on cognitive processing in a population of healthy older men who received T supplementation. Methods: Sixty healthy, community-dwelling volunteers aged 50 to 90 years completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants were randomized to receive weekly IM injections of 100 mg T enanthate plus daily oral placebo pill ( T group, n = 20), 100 mg testosterone enanthate plus 1 mg daily of anastrozole, an aromatase inhibitor ( oral pill), to block the conversion of T to estradiol ( AT group, n = 19), or saline injection and placebo pill ( placebo group, n = 21) for 6 weeks. Cognitive evaluations using a battery of neuropsychological tests were conducted at baseline, week 3 and week 6 of treatment, and after 6 weeks of washout. Results: Circulating total T was increased from baseline an average of 238% in the T and AT treatment groups. Estradiol increased an average of 81% in the T group and decreased 50% in the AT group during treatment. Significant improvements in spatial memory were evident in the AT and T treatment groups. However, only the group with elevated estradiol levels ( T group) demonstrated significant verbal memory improvement. Conclusion: In healthy older men, improvement in verbal memory induced by testosterone administration depends on aromatization of testosterone to estradiol, whereas improvement in spatial memory occurs in the absence of increases in estradiol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available