4.7 Article

Amperometric determination of bonded glucose with an MnO2 and glucose oxidase bulk-modified screen-printed electrode using flow-injection analysis

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 559-564

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.07.023

Keywords

bonded glucose; screen-printed electrode; manganese dioxide; glucose oxidase; glucosidase; flow-injection analyses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A screen-printed amperometric biosensor based on carbon ink double bulk-modified with MnO2 as a mediator and glucose oxidase as a biocomponent was investigated for its ability to serve as a detector for bonded glucose in different compounds, such as cellobiose, saccharose, (-)-4-nitrophenyl-beta-glucopyranoside, as well as in beer samples by flow-injection analysis (FIA). The biosensor could be operated under physiological conditions (0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5) and exhibited good reproducibility and stability. Bonded glucose was released with glucosidase in Solution. and the free glucose was detected with the modified screen-printed electrode (SPE). The release of glucose by the aid of glucosidase from cellobiose. saccharose and (-)-4-nitrophenyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside in solution showed that stoichiometric quantities of free glucose could be monitored in all three cases. The linear range of the amperometric response of the biosensor in the FIA-mode flow rate 0.2 mL min(-1), injection volume 0.25 mL, operation potential 0.48 V versus Ag/AgCl extends from 11 to 13,900 mu-mol L-1 glucose in free form. The limit of detection (3sigma) is 1 mumol L-1 glucose. A concentration of 100 mumol L-1 yields a relative standard deviation of approximately 7% with five injections. These values correspond to the same concentrations of bonded glucose Supposed that it is liberated quantitatively (incubation for 2 h with glucosidase). Bonded glucose could be determined in beer samples using the same assay. The results corresponded very well with the reference procedure. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available