3.8 Article

A subnormal plasma volume in formerly preeclamptic women is associated with a low venous capacitance

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2004.09.002

Keywords

preeclampsia; plasma volume; venous capacitance; pregnancy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy induces a smaller rise in plasma volume in formerly preeclamptic women with a pre-existent subnormal plasma volume than in their counterparts with a normal plasma volume. These women, also have a three times higher recurrence rate of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders. In this study we tested the hypothesis that a subnormal plasma volume in these women is related to a lower capacitance of their venous compartment. METHODS: In 31 nonpregnant formerly preeclamptic women with a subnormal plasma volume and eight parous controls, we infused intravenously 500 mL of a modified gelatin solution over 30 minutes. Before and after infusion we measured the circulating levels of alpha-atrial natriuretic peptide (alpha-ANP) and active plasma renin concentration (APRC). During volume loading, we recorded the change in heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output using. pulse contour analysis. We measured the ratio of percent change in blood volume and percent change in cardiac output during volume loading as a marker or venous capacitance. RESULTS: During volume loading, patients differed from controls by a larger rise in alpha-ANP, pulse rate, and cardiac output, and by a lower estimated venous capacitance. The concomitant response of stroke volume and APRC did not differ appreciably between groups. CONCLUSION: Formerly preeclamptic women with a subnormal plasma volume differ from controls with a normal plasma volume by a reduced venous capacitance. These results support our hypothesis that, in these women, a subnormal plasma volume indicates the presence of a subnormal venous capacitance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available