4.5 Article

Discordant utility of ideal body weight and body mass index as predictors of mortality in lung transplant recipients

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 137-144

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.09.040

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: An upper limit of 130% predicted ideal body weight (PIBW) has been promulgated for assessing lung transplant (LTx) candidacy, but no data in the lung transplant population support this value. A prior study used body mass index (BMI) to suggest greater mortality risk in obese allograft recipients, but the number of studied patients was small. Methods: Pre-operative PIBW percentage and BMI were obtained for all first-time, adult LTx recipients at our institution (n = 283). We compared survival data at 90 days and as of July 31, 2002, using multivariable regression and Cox modeling. Results: There were 46 obese (BMI greater than or equal to 30) patients and 72 patient s >130% PIBW, including 43 patients previously thought to fall within a normal PIBW range who were reclassified as overweight for this analysis. Cox. modeling revealed no significant impact of PIBW (>130% or continuous) or BMI (>30 kg/m(2) or continuous) on overall survival. Predicted ideal body weight also had no influence on 90-day mortality. When we tested PIBW in the group previously deemed of acceptable weight, we likewise found no association with mortality at 90 days or overall. For BMI only, 90-day odds ratios for death were significantly greater for obese (BMI greater than or equal to 30; odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-9.48) patients than for normal-weight patients. Conclusion: Indices of pre-operative obesity did not predict long-term outcome in this large cohort of LTx recipients. The data suggest that BMI stratification may identify a group of patients at. risk for increased short-term mortality, whereas PIBW is not a significant outcome predictor. Copyright (C) 2005 by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available