4.5 Article

Genetic determinants of biofilm development of opaque and translucent Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 1160-1182

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04453.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. PHS HHS [1 R15 G065837-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates display variation in colony morphology, alternating between opaque (OP) and translucent (TR) cell types. Phase variation is the consequence of genetic alterations in the locus encoding the quorum sensing output regulator OpaR. Here, we show that both cell types form stable, but distinguishable biofilms that differ with respect to attachment and detachment profiles to polystyrene, pellicle formation and stability at the air/medium interface, and submerged biofilm architecture and dispersion at a solid/liquid interface. The pellicle, which is a cohesive mat of cells, was exploited to identify mutants having altered or defective biofilm formation. Transposon insertion mutants were obtained with defects in genes affecting multiple cell surface characteristics, including extracellular polysaccharide, mannose-sensitive haemagglutinin type 4 pili and polar (but not lateral) flagella. Other insertions disrupted genes coding for potential secreted proteins or transporters of secreted proteins, specifically haemolysin co-regulated protein and an RTX toxin-like membrane fusion transporter, as well as potential modifiers of cell surface molecules (nagAC operon). The pellicle screen also identified mutants with lesions in regulatory genes encoding H-NS, a CsgD-like repressor and an AraC-like protein. This work initiates the characterization of V. parahaemolyticus biofilm formation in the OP and TR cell types and identifies a diverse repertoire of cell surface elements that participate in determining multicellular architecture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available