4.5 Article

Distinct inhibitory effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A on calcineurin phosphatase activity

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.074930

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have compared the pharmacodynamic properties of calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus and cyclosporin A in rats to clarify the different therapeutic drug monitoring strategy of both drugs in a clinical situation. In various tissue extracts, the inhibition of calcineurin activity by cyclosporin A was significantly greater than that by tacrolimus at the same drug concentration ( 1 muM) in the thymus, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and testis ( p < 0.05). The time profiles of blood concentrations and calcineurin activity in whole blood were examined after single or repeated administration of each drug in rats. A substantial time delay in the inhibition was observed following the single administration of tacrolimus or cyclosporin A, resulting in an anticlockwise hysteresis in the relationship between blood concentrations and calcineurin inhibition in whole blood. In contrast, such a hysteresis loop diminished after the repeated administration of each drug, and the recovery rate of calcineurin activity was greater for the inhibition induced by cyclosporin A than by tacrolimus. Furthermore, tacrolimus produced a comparable inhibition of calcineurin activity in whole blood at lower blood concentrations than cyclosporin A. Overall, the effect compartment model well described the time profiles of calcineurin activity in whole blood after the single and repeated administrations of each drug. These findings suggest that the properties of calcineurin inhibition differ between tacrolimus and cyclosporin A. Distinct pharmacodynamics may partly contribute to the therapeutic drug monitoring strategy in transplant patients receiving calcineurin inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available