4.4 Article

Breaking the spherical and chromatic aberration barrier in transmission electron microscopy

Journal

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 209-214

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2004.09.013

Keywords

aberration correction; monochromator; high resolution TEM

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the invention of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in 1932 (Z. Physik 78 (1932) 318) engineering improvements have advanced system resolutions to levels that are now limited only by the two fundamental aberrations of electron lenses; spherical and chromatic aberration (Z. Phys. 101 (1936) 593). Since both aberrations scale with the dimensions of the lens, research resolution requirements are pushing the designs to lenses with only a few mm space in the pole-piece gap for the specimen. This is in conflict with the demand for more and more space at the specimen. necessary in order to enable novel techniques in TEM, such as He-cooled cryo electron microscopy. 3D-reconstruction through tomography (Science 302 (2003) 1396) TEM in gaseous environments, or in situ experiments (Nature 421 (2004) 426). All these techniques will only be able to achieve Angstrom resolution when (he aberration barriers have been overcome. The spherical aberration barrier has recently been broken by introducing spherical aberration correctors (Nature 392 (1998) 392 418 (2002) 617), but the correction of the remaining chromatic aberrations have proved to be too difficult for the present state of technology (Optik 57 (1980) 73). Here we present an alternative and successful method to eliminate the chromatic blur, which consists of monochromating the TEM beam (Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 161 (1999) 191). We show directly interpretable resolutions well below 1 Angstrom for the first time. which is significantly better than any TEM operating at 200 KV has reached before. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available