4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Isoelectric beads for proteome pre-fractionation. II: Experimental evaluation in a multicompartment electrolyzer

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 629-638

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401112

Keywords

amphoteric buffering resins; isoelectric separation; multicompartment electrolyzers; proteome pre-fractionation; surface enhanced laser desorption; ionization mass spectrometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteome pre-fractionation in multicompartment electrolyzers is proposed here, with substantial modifications as compared to the standard technique. First of all, the classical isoelectric, buffering membranes, delimiting each compartment and acting, in pairs, as isoelectric traps, have been replaced by isoelectric buffering beads, operating on the same principle, but allowing unhindered migration of proteins (lack of sieving properties, contrary to typical continuous membrane barriers). Secondly, the isoelectric beads are not made in the conventional manner, with ionic acrylamide derivative monomers throughout their central core, but are composed of a hard, ceramic core, coated with an amphoteric buffering polymer. This minimizes mass transfer resistance of proteins that are transiently adsorbed onto the beads. As a result, significantly reduced separation times, of the order of ca. 3 h, are required for developing steady-state patterns, as compared to the lengths times (overnight and much longer) in conventional multicompartment electrolyzers operating with isoelectric membranes. Examples of separation of standard marker proteins, as well as entire Escherichia coli lysates and human serum proteins, are given. The obtained fractions are analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available