4.6 Article

Decoupling in an expanding universe: backreaction barely constrains short distance effects in the cosmic microwave background

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2005/02/001

Keywords

trans-Planckian physics; CMBR theory; quantum gravity phenomenology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We clarify the status of trans-Planckian effects on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy. We do so using the boundary effective action formalism of hep-th/ 0401164 which accounts quantitatively for the cosmological vacuum ambiguity. In this formalism we can clearly ( 1) delineate the validity of cosmological effective actions in an expanding universe. The corollary of the initial state ambiguity is the existence of an earliest time. The inability of an effective action to describe physics before this time demands that one sets initial conditions on the earliest time hypersurface. A calculation then shows that CMB anisotropy measurements are generically sensitive to high energy corrections to the initial conditions. ( 2) We compute the one-loop contribution to the stress tensor due to high energy physics corrections to an arbitrary cosmological initial state. We find that phenomenological bounds on the backreaction do not lead to strong constraints on the coefficient of the leading boundary irrelevant operator. Rather, we find that the power spectrum itself is the quantity most sensitive to initial state corrections. ( 3) The computation of the one-loop backreaction confirms arguments that irrelevant corrections to the Bunch - Davies initial state yield non-adiabatic vacua characterized by an energy excess at some earlier time. However, this excess only dominates over the classical background at times before the 'earliest time' at which the effective action is valid. We conclude that the cosmological effective action with boundaries is a fully self-consistent and quantitative approach to trans-Planckian corrections to the CMB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available