4.2 Article

Patients preferences in chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 107-113

Publisher

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.107

Keywords

non-small-cell lung cancer; chemotherapy; patient preference; decision-making

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine how Japanese patients with lung cancer weigh potential survival, chemotherapy response rate, and symptom relief against the potential toxicity of different treatments in cancer chemotherapy. Methods and Patients We used a questionnaire describing a hypothetical situation about stage IV nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Seventy-three patients with lung cancer who had received chemotherapy and 120 patients with other respiratory disease as the control group were asked to rate the minimal benefit that would make two hypothetical treatments acceptable. For chance of cure, response but not cure, and symptom relief, the subjects could give answers from 1% to 100% and for prolonging life could give answers from 1 to 60 months. Results Patients with lung cancer were significantly more likely than were patients with other respiratory diseases to accept either intensive or less-intensive treatments for a potentially small benefit for chance of cure, response but not cure, and symptom relief. The degree of survival advantage that patients require before accepting cancer treatment with its associated toxicity varied widely. If their lives were prolonged 3 months, 19% and 21% of patients with lung cancer would choose to receive intensive and less-intensive treatment, respectively. When the chance of symptom relief was 70%, 73% of patients with lung cancer were willing to choose intensive chemotherapy. Factor associated with patients' choice of chemotherapy in both groups was age. Conclusion Oncologists must consider the substantial range of attitudes to chemotherapy among patients when making treatment decisions and they must give patients the opportunity to be included in this process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available