4.6 Article

Constraints on the star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 431, Issue 1, Pages 73-85

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041057

Keywords

galaxies : formation; galaxies : evolution; stars : statistics; stars : luminosity function, mass function; galaxies : stellar content; stars : Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) and C-M

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the analysis of deep colour-magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of 6 stellar fields in the LMC. The data were obtained using HST/WFPC2 in the F814W (similar toI) and F555W (similar toV) filters, reaching V-555 similar to 26.5. We discuss and apply a method of correcting CMDs for photometric incompleteness. A method to generate artificial CMDs based on a model star formation history is also developed. This method incorporates photometric error effects, unresolved binaries, reddening and allows use of different forms of the initial mass function and of the SFH itself. We use the Partial Models Method, as presented by Gallart and others, for CMD modelling, and include control experiments to prove its validity in a search for constraints on the Large Magellanic Cloud star formation history in different regions. Reliable star formation histories for each field are recovered by this method. In all fields, a gap in star formation with tau similar to 700 Myr is observed. Field-to-field variations have also been observed. The two fields near the LMC bar present some significant star forming events, having formed both young (t less than or similar to 1 Gyr) and old (tau greater than or similar to 10 Gyr) stars, with a clear gap from 3-6 Gyr. Two other fields display quite similar SFHs, with increased star formation having taken place at tau similar or equal to 2-3 Gyr and 6 less than or similar to tau less than or similar to 10 Gyr. The remaining two fields present star formation histories closer to uniform, with no clear event of enhanced star formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available