4.4 Article

Effects of volatile coatings on the laser-induced incandescence of soot

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS B-LASERS AND OPTICS
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 343-358

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-013-5463-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sandia Laboratory Directed Research and Development program
  2. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, the US Department of Energy
  3. National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94-AL85000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have measured time-resolved laser-induced incandescence (LII) from combustion-generated mature soot extracted from a burner and (1) coated with oleic acid or (2) coated with oleic acid and then thermally denuded using a thermodenuder. The soot samples were size selected using a differential mobility analyzer and characterized with a scanning mobility particle sizer, centrifugal particle mass analyzer, and transmission electron microscope. The results demonstrate a strong influence of coatings on the magnitude and temporal evolution of the LII signal. For coated particles, higher laser fluences are required to reach signal levels comparable to those of uncoated particles. The peak LII curve is shifted to increasingly higher fluences with increasing coating thickness until this effect saturates at a coating thickness of similar to 75 % by mass. These effects are predominantly attributable to the additional energy needed to vaporize the coating while heating the particle. LII signals are higher and signal decay rates are significantly slower for thermally denuded particles relative to coated or uncoated particles, particularly at low and intermediate laser fluences. Our results suggest negligible coating enhancement in absorption cross-section for combustion-generated soot at the laser fluences used. Apparent enhancement in absorption with restructuring may be caused by less conductive cooling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available