4.5 Article

Induction of tissue kallikrein in human carotid atheroma does not lead to kallikrein-kinins pathway activation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 359-366

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200502000-00018

Keywords

atherosclerosis; angiotensin; gene expression; hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The impairment of the tissue kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) may result in atheroma development. To determine the involvement of KKS in pathophysiology of human atherosclerosis, we examined the expression of all components of this system as well as angiotensinogen (another tissue kallikrein (TK) substrate), at messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and protein levels in the human carotid artery with and without atheroma. Methods mRNA levels were compared with semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between atheroma plaque and intact tissue obtained during carotid endarterectomy in 15 patients. The cellular localization of the transcripts and proteins was analyzed with in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. TK activity was measured using chromogenic substrate. Results The kininogen mRNA was not detected in carotid wall. The TK mRNA was increased four-fold and TK activity 23-fold in atheroma plaque compared with intact tissue. No difference was observed for 131, 132 receptors, kallistatin, angiotensinogen and protein-kinase G type 1alpha (PK-G) mRNAs. The TK and angiotensinogen transcripts as well as kininogen and angiotensinogen proteins were present in both intimal and medial cells. The kininogen immunoreactivity was weaker in atheroma. Conclusions All KKS components were synthesized in arterial wall except kininogen probably coming from plasma. The absence of PK-G mRNA down-regulation in atheroma suggests that the kallikrein induction does not lead to KKS activation. (C) 2005 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available