4.4 Article

CO2* chemiluminescence study at low and elevated pressures

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS B-LASERS AND OPTICS
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages 529-538

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00340-012-5051-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EEC-1004859]
  2. Alstom Power, Baden, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemiluminescence experiments have been performed to assess the state of current kinetics modeling. The difficulty with modeling lies in its broad emission spectrum, making it a challenge to isolate it from background emission of species such as CHau and CH2Oau. Experiments were performed in a mixture of 0.0005H(2)+0.01N(2)O+0.03CO+0.9595Ar in an attempt to isolate emission. Temperatures ranged from 1654 K to 2221 K at two average pressures, 1.4 and 10.4 atm. The unique time histories of the various chemiluminescence species in the unconventional mixture employed at these conditions allow for easy identification of the concentration. Two different wavelengths to capture were used; one optical filter was centered at 415 nm and the other at 458 nm. The use of these two different wavelengths was done to verify that broadband was in fact being captured, and not emission from other species such as CHau and CH2Oau. As a baseline for time history and peak magnitude comparison, OHau emission was captured at 307 nm simultaneously with the two filters. The results from the two filters were consistent with each other, implying that indeed the same species (i.e., ) was being measured at both wavelengths. A first-generation kinetics model for and CH2Oau was developed, since no comprehensively validated one exists to date. CH2Oau and CHau were ruled out as being present in the experiments at any measurable level, based on calculations and comparisons with the data. Agreement with the model was only fair, which necessitates future improvements for a better understanding of chemiluminescence as well as the kinetics of the ground state species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available