4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of environmental and clinical populations of Cryptococcus neoformans

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 556-564

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.556-564.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI044975, R01 AI025783, AI 44975, AI 25783, AI 07392, T32 AI007392] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cryptococcus neoformans is a major, global cause of meningoencephallitis in immunocompromised patients. Despite advances in the molecular epidemiology of C neoformans, its population structure and mode of reproduction are not well understood. In the environment, it is associated with avian guano or vegetation. We collected nearly 800 environmental isolates from three locations in the United States (viz., North Carolina, California, and Texas) and compared them with one another and with clinical isolates from North Carolina. As expected, they consisted of the most prevalent serotypes, serotypes A and D, as well as serotype AD hybrids. The majority of environmental isolates were obtained from pigeon excreta. All environmental and clinical isolates of serotype A or D had the MATalpha mating-type allele. However, the AD hybrids included MATa alleles typical of serotypes A and D. Using an amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting technique with two primer pairs, we identified 12 genotypes among the isolates of serotype A. Six of these genotypes were present in both the clinical and the environmental populations. However, one of the most prevalent environmental genotypes was absent from the clinical samples, and two other genotypes were isolated only from patients. The combined molecular data suggest that this environmental population of C. neoformans is predominantly clonal, although there was evidence for recent or past recombination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available