4.7 Article

Type V collagen regulates the expression of apoptotic and stress response genes by breast cancer cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 202, Issue 2, Pages 411-421

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20131

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type V collagen is a minor component of normal human breast stroma, which is subjected to over-deposition in cases of ductal infiltrating carcinoma (DIC). We reported that, if used as a culture substrate for the DIC cell line 8701-BC, it exhibited poorly-adhesive properties and restrained the proliferative and motile behavior of the cell subpopulation able to attach onto it. Moreover, this collagen species was able to trigger DNA fragmentation and impair survival of 8701-BC cells. In this study, we have extended our investigation with the aim to obtain further evidence that the death induced by type V collagen was of the apoptotic type by (i) microscopic detection and quantitation of Apoptag-labeled cells, (ii) analysis of the expression levels of selected genes coding for apoptosis-linked factors, caspases, and stress-response proteins by conventional and semi-quantitative multiplex PCR, and (iii) evaluation of the extent of caspase activation by chrornogenic assay. We report here that type V collagen is able to determine an increase in the percentage of Apoptag-positive cells, to up-regulate Bcl-xS, Bad, Dap kinase, hsf-1, mthsp75, caspase-1, -5, -8, -9, and -14, whilst down-regulating Bcl-2, Bcl-xbeta, and hsp60. Treatment of cell lysates with chromogenic tetrapeptide substrates specific for caspase-1, -5, -8, and -9 demonstrated a marked increase of enzymatic activity in the presence of type V collagen. Our data validate 8701-BC cell line as a suitable in vitro model for further and more detailed studies on the molecular mechanisms of the death response induced by type V collagen on primary DIC cells. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available