4.7 Article

Mesoscale analysis of dynamic fragmentation of ceramics under tension

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 823-834

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.10.034

Keywords

ceramics; fragmentation; cohesive finite element; granular microstructure; grain boundary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fragmentation of a small ceramic specimen subjected to rapid uniform expansion is analyzed numerically at the mesoscale level using the cohesive/volumetric finite element (CVFE) scheme. The analysis is performed in plane strain and assumes intergranular crack motion. A combination of cohesive and optimization-based contact enforcement algorithms is used to model the complex contact events between the fragments generated in the process. The damage process is quantified using two parameters: one to capture the evolution of distributed damage in the ceramic specimen, and the other to represent the dynamic creation of discrete fragments. The basic features of the fragmentation process such as the initiation time and the evolution of the fragment size distribution are investigated. It is observed that the linear exponential distribution proposed by Grady and Kipp [Geometric and dynamic fragmentation. J. Appl. Phys 1985;58(3)1210-22] adequately represents the cumulative fragment distribution throughout the fragmentation process. We also quantify the effect of the failure strength on the initiation and extent of damage. The granular microstructure of the specimen does not affect the initiation time of the fragmentation. but the average grain size influences the final damage of the material and has all effect oil the average fragment size at higher loading rates. The average fragment size obtained numerically for a range of loading rates shows good agreement with existing theoretical models. (C) 2004 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available