4.7 Article

The effect of high frequency electric pulses on muscle contractions and antitumor efficiency in vivo for a potential use in clinical electrochemotherapy

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 121-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2004.07.004

Keywords

electrochemotherapy; pulse; frequency; muscle torque; pain; strain gauge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Muscle contractions present the main source of unpleasant sensations for patients undergoing electrochemotherapy. The contractions are a consequence of high voltage pulse delivery. Relatively low repetition frequency of these pulses (1 Hz) results in separate muscle contractions associated with each, single pulse that is delivered. It would be possible to reduce the number of unpleasant sensations by increasing the frequency of electric pulses above the frequency of tetanic contraction, provided that the antitumor efficiency of electrochemotherapy remains the same. These assumptions were investigated in the present paper by measuring the muscle torque at different pulse repetition frequencies and at two different pulse amplitudes in rats and studying the antitumor efficiency of electrochemotherapy at different pulse repetition frequencies on tumors in mice. Measurements of muscle torque confirmed that pulse frequencies above the frequency of tetanic contraction (> 100 Hz) reduce the number of individual contractions to a single muscle contraction. Regardless of the pulse amplitude, with increasing pulse frequency muscle torque increases up to the frequency of 100 or 200 Hz and then decreases to a value similar to that after application of a 1 Hz pulse train. Electrochemotherapy in vivo with higher repetition frequencies inhibits tumor growth and is efficient at all pulse frequencies examined (1 Hz - 5 kHz). These results suggest that there is a considerable potential for clinical use of high frequency pulses in electrochemotherapy. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available