4.3 Article

Backbone-only restraints for fast determination of the protein fold:: The role of paramagnetism-based restraints.: Cytochrome b562 as an example

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 172, Issue 2, Pages 191-200

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.07.024

Keywords

residual dipolar couplings; NMR; b(562); paramagnetic; solution structure determination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CHalpha residual dipolar couplings (Deltardc's) were measured for the oxidized cytochrome b(562) from Escherichia coli as a result of its partial self-orientation in high magnetic fields due to the anisotropy of the overall magnetic susceptibility tensor. Both the low spin iron (III) heme and the four-helix bundle fold contribute to the magnetic anisotropy tensor. CHalpha Deltardc's which span a larger range than the analogous NH values (already available in the literature) sample large space variations at variance with NH Deltardc's. which are largely isooriented within a helices. The whole structure is now significantly refined with the chemical shift index and CHalpha Deltardc's. The latter are particularly useful also in defining the molecular magnetic anisotropy parameters. It is shown here that the backbone folding can be conveniently and accurately determined using backbone restraints only, which include NOEs, hydrogen bonds, residual dipolar couplings, pseudocontact shifts, and chemical shift index. All these restraints are easily and quickly determined from the backbone assignment. The calculated backbone structure is comparable to that obtained by using also side chain restraint. Furthermore, the structure obtained with backbone only restraints is, in its whole, very similar to that obtained with the complete set of restraints. The paramagnetism based restraints are shown to be absolutely relevant, especially for Deltardc's. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available