4.3 Article

Influence of chronological aging on the survival and nucleotide content of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells grown in different conditions:: occurrence of a high concentration of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine in stationary cells grown in 2% glucose

Journal

FEMS YEAST RESEARCH
Volume 5, Issue 4-5, Pages 387-398

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.10.001

Keywords

aging; ATP; NAD(+); Saccharomyces cerevisiae; UDP-N-acetylglucosamine; viability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (strain W303) grown in a minimal medium (containing 2% or 0.1% glucose) until exponential or stationary phase, were subjected to chronological aging in water, and yeast viability and nucleotide content were analyzed along several days of nutrient starvation. Cells collected in exponential phase (whether grown in the presence of 0.1% or 2% glucose) were viable up to five days and thereafter the viability decreased linearly with a half-survival rate of around eight days. ATP and other nucleoside triphosphates decreased similarly in both cases. Cells collected in stationary phase, and transferred to water, behaved differently whether grown in 0.1% or in NO glucose, with a half-survival life of around nine and 28 days respectively. A double mutant in glycogen synthase (gsy1Delta gsy2Delta) and its isogenic wild-type strain, grown to stationary phase in 2% glucose, presented a similar half-survival life of around eight days. The W303 cells grown to stationary phase in the presence of NO glucose showed a 7-fold increase of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) as compared with the level present in the cells grown in any of the other three metabolic situations. The nature of UDP-GlcNAc was established by MALDI-TOF ionization analysis. It is also worth noting that the rate of decay of NAD+ was lower than that of ATP in any of the situations here considered. (C) 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available