4.7 Article

Liver histology in patients with HBsAg negative anti-HBc and anti-HCV positive chronic hepatitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 222-226

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.20260

Keywords

HBV silent infection; viral hepatitis coinfection; viral interference; histology chronic hepatitis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The liver histology of 68 consecutive anti-HCV/ HCV-RNA positive chronic hepatitis patients who were HBsAg/anti-HBs negative, anti-HBc positive (Case bC group) was compared with that of 68 anti-HCV/HCV-RNA positive chronic hepatitis patients who were HBsAg/anti-HBc negative (control C group). The patients were pair-matched by age ( 5 years), sex, and risk factors for the acquisition of parenteral infection. Case bC group showed a significantly higher mean fibrosis score (2.3 +/- 1.1) than control C group (1.5 +/- 1.1, P < 0.001) and more histological evidence of cirrhosis (22% vs. 7.3%, P < 0.05). In addition, the patients in Case bC group showed more severe inflammation of the portal tracts (3.5 +/- 0.8 vs. 3.0 +/- 1.1, P < 0.005) and there was a higher prevalence of patients with rhomboid-shaped hepatocytes (26.4% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.005), acidophilic bodies (33.8% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.0001), sinusoidal inflammation (29.4% vs. 10.3%, P < 0.01), lymphoid follicles in the portal tracts (72% vs. 44.1%, P < 0.05), Kupffer cell proliferation (29.4% vs. 11.8%, P < 0.05), bile duct damage (44.1% vs. 10.3%, P < 0.0001), and ductular proliferation (30.9% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001) than in control C group. No difference in these histological features was observed between HBV-DNA negative and positive patients in Case bC group. The data suggest that anti-HBc positive patients with HCV chronic infection have a significantly higher degree of liver fibrosis, and that hepatocellular apoptosis, bile duct damage, and ductular proliferation correlate with the presence of this antibody in the serum. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available