4.7 Article

Self-reported depressive symptom measures: Sensitivity to detecting change in a randomized, controlled trial of chronically depressed, nonpsychotic outpatients

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 405-416

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300614

Keywords

chronic depression; psychotherapy; nefazodone; symptom measures

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated and compared the performance of three self-report measures: ( 1) 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (IDS-SR30); ( 2) 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR16); and ( 3) Patient Global Impression-Improvement (PGI-I) in assessing clinical outcomes in depressed patients during a 12-week, acute phase, randomized, controlled trial comparing nefazodone, cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), and the combination in the treatment of chronic depression. The IDS-SR30, QIDS-SR16, PGI-I, and the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS24) ratings were collected at baseline and at weeks 1-4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Response was defined a priori as a greater than or equal to50% reduction in baseline total score for the IDS-SR30 or for the QIDS-SR16 or as a PGI-I score of 1 or 2 at exit. Overall response rates (LOCF) to nefazodone were 41% (IDS-SR30), 45% (QIDS-SR16), 53% (PCI-I), and 47% (HDRS17). For CBASP, response rates were 41% (IDS-SR30), 45% (QIDS-SR16), 48% (PGI-I), and 46% (HDRS17). For the combination, response rates were 68% (IDS-SR30 and QIDS-SR16), 73% (PGI-I), and 76% (HDRS17). Similarly, remission rates were comparable for nefazodone (IDS-SR30 = 32%, QIDS-SR16 = 28%, PGI-I = 22%, HDRS17 = 30%), for CBASP (IDS-SR30 = 32%, QIDS-SR16 = 30%, PGI-I = 21%, HDRS17 = 32%), and for the combination (IDS=SR30 = 52%, QIDS-SR16 = 50%, PGI-I = 25%, HDRS17 = 49%). Both the IDS-SR30 and QIDS-SR16 closely mirrored and confirmed findings based on the HDRS24. These findings raise the possibility that these two self-reports could provide cost-and time-efficient substitutes for clinician ratings in treatment trials of outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD without cognitive impairment. Global patient ratings such as the PGI-I, as opposed to specific item-based ratings, provide less valid findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available