4.5 Article

Impact of age on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 190-197

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7556-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some studies indicate that age at the time of surgery has a general effect on outcomes. The impact of age on the quality of life (QOL) of patients with rectal cancer, however, has not been investigated. The present study was conducted to address this issue. Over a 5-year period the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-QLQ-C-30 and a tumor-specific module were prospectively administered to patients before surgery, at discharge, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Comparisons were made between age groups. A total of 519 patients participated in the study. QOL data were available for 253 patients. Significant differences were observed only between patients aged 69 years and younger (less than or equal to 69 years) (169/253) and those aged 70 years and older (greater than or equal to 70 years) (85/253). Physical and role functioning was better for patients less than or equal to 69 years; patients greater than or equal to 70 years suffered from increased pain and fatigue. Younger patients had more difficulty with sexual enjoyment, and over time sexual strain was worse for patients aged greater than or equal to70 years during the early postoperative period but improved, whereas patients aged greater than or equal to69 years had increasing levels of strain over time. The findings in this study confirmed that QOL is dynamic over time and that age has an impact on QOL and sexuality. Patients aged greater than or equal to70 years are affected by impaired physical functioning, global health, and fatigue, whereas increased treatment strain during the early postoperative period improves over time. Patients aged greater than or equal to69 years experience increased strain because of impaired sexual function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available