4.4 Article

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 243-246

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1381/0960892053268516

Keywords

laparoscopic cholecystectomy; obesity; morbid obesity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice for gallstones. Obesity was initially considered a contraindication to this approach. The aim of this report is to review our experience with LC, to evaluate the role of BMI in the outcome. Methods: The records of 1,804 patients who underwent LC for symptomatic cholelithiasis from May 1992 to January 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: less than or equal to 24.9, 25.0-29.9, 30.0-34.9, 35.0-39.9 and greater than or equal to40 kg/m(2). Results: Of the 1,804 patients [1,379 females (76.4%) and 425 males (23.6%)] who underwent LC, 431(23.9%), 924 (51.2%), 355 (19.7%), 68 (3.8%) and 26 (1.4%) had BMI values of : 24.9, 25.0-29.9, 30.0-.34.9, 35.0-39.9 and greater than or equal to40 kg/m(2), respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 94 patients (5.2%), and complications occurred in 39 patients (2.2%). There was no correlation between BMI and the conversion rate (P=0.593) and complication rate (P=0.944), while the hospital stay was similar between the groups with successful LC. The only significant difference was the longer operating time in the two obesity groups (P<0.001). Conclusions: LC is effective and safe in patients with morbid obesity. As it carried low risks of conversion and perioperative complications, we suggest that LC is the select approach for these patients. Moreover, the rapid mobilization and hospital discharge following LC may provide extra benefit to these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available