4.8 Article

Molecular phylogeny of the plant pathogenic genus Botrytis and the evolution of host specificity

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 333-346

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi020

Keywords

Botrytis; necrotrophic fungus; coevolution; host shift; Bayesian inference; molecular phylogeny

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cosmopolitan genus Botrytis contains 22 recognized species and one hybrid. The current classification is largely based on morphological characters and, to a minor extent. on physiology and host range. In this study. a classification of the genus was constructed based on DNA sequence data of three nuclear protein-coding genes (RPB2. G3PDH. and HSP60) and compared with the traditional classification. Sexual reproduction and the host range, important fitness traits. were traced in the tree and used for the identification of major evolutionary events during speciation. The phylogenetic analysis corroborated the classical species delineation. In addition, the hybrid status of B. allii (B. byssoidea X B. aclada) was confirmed. Both individual gene trees and combined trees show that the genus Botrytis can be divided into two clades, radiating after the separation of Botrytis from other Sclerotiniaceae genera. Clade 1 contains four species that all colonize exclusively eudicot hosts, whereas clade 2 contains 18 species that are pathogenic on either eudicot (3) or monocot (15) hosts. A comparison of Botrytis and angiosperm phylogenies shows that cospeciation of pathogens and their hosts have not occurred during their respective evolution. Rather, we propose that host shifts have occurred during Botrytis speciation, possibly by the acquisition of novel pathogenicity factors. Loss of sexual reproduction has occurred at least three times and is supposed to be a consequence of negative selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available