4.5 Article

Follicle-stimulating hormone regulates oocyte growth by modulation of expression of oocyte and granulosa cell factors

Journal

ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 2, Pages 941-949

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-0826

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oocyte-granulosa cell communication is essential for oocyte development. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the effect of FSH on expression of Kit ligand (KL), growth/differentiation factor-9, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-15, and Kit during growth of oocyte-granulosa cell complexes (OGCs) in vitro; 2) to investigate the role of BMP-15 in regulation of KL expression; and 3) to correlate mRNA expression with oocyte growth. OGCs from 12-d-old mice were cultured for up to 7 d in the presence of FSH [0.05 ng/ml (low), 5 ng/ml (high)] or BMP-15 (10 or 100 ng/ml). Transcripts were quantified using real-time RT-PCR, and oocyte and OGC diameters were measured. FSH regulated KL expression in a biphasic manner, with low FSH decreasing the KL-1/KL-2 ratio, and high FSH increasing the KL-1/KL-2 ratio, compared with controls (P < 0.05). The decrease in KL-1/KL-2 ratio with low FSH was due to increased KL-2 mRNA expression. Both FSH concentrations increased OGC diameter (P < 0.05), but only low FSH promoted oocyte growth (P < 0.05). High FSH also decreased BMP-15 expression (P < 0.05). FSH-stimulated oocyte growth was inhibited by Gleevec, an inhibitor of Kit activity. BMP-15 increased both KL-1 and KL-2 mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.05) but did not alter the KL-1/KL-2 ratio or promote oocyte growth. When the KL-1/KL-2 ratio was increased by exogenous KL-1, FSH-stimulated oocyte growth was suppressed (P < 0.05), suggesting that lowered KL-1/KL-2 ratio is important for oocyte growth. In summary, the correct concentration of FSH is crucial for appropriate modulation of KL and BMP-15 to promote oocyte growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available