4.5 Article

An ultrasonic air temperature measurement system with self-correction function for humidity

Journal

MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 548-555

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/16/2/030

Keywords

ultrasonic sensors; humidity sensors; temperature measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an ultrasonic measurement system for air temperature with high accuracy and instant response. It can measure the average temperature of the environmental air by detecting the changes of the speed of the ultrasound in the air. The changes of speed of sound are computed from combining variations of time-of-flight (TOF) from a binary frequency shift-keyed (BFSK) ultrasonic signal and phase shift from continuous waves [11]. In addition, another proposed technique for the ultrasonic air temperature measurement is the self-correction functionality within a highly humid environment. It utilizes a relative humidity/water vapour sensor and applies the theory of how sound speed changes in a humid environment. The proposed new ultrasonic air temperature measurement has the capability of self-correction for the environment variable of humidity. Especially under the operational environment with high fluctuations of various humidity levels, the proposed system can accurately self-correct the errors on the conventional ultrasonic thermometer caused by the changing density of the vapours in the air. Including the high humidity effect, a proof-of-concept experiment demonstrates that in dry air (relative humidity, RH = 10%) without humidity correction, it is accurate to 0.4 degreesC from 0 degreesC to 80 degreesC, while in highly humid air (relative humidity, RH = 90%) with self-correction functionality, it is accurate to 0.3 degreesC from 0 degreesC to 80 degreesC with 0.05% resolution and temperature changes are instantly reflected within 100 ms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available