4.6 Article

Antiphospholipid antibodies in immune thrombocytopenic purpura tend to emerge in exacerbation and decline in remission

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages 366-372

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05314.x

Keywords

immune thrombocytopenic purpura; antiphospholipid antibodies; beta 2-glycoprotein 1; cardiolipin; bleeding

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) in immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) has been reported, their clinical significance is not clear. The present study investigated APLA profiles in relation to the clinical stages of ITP. We studied APLA in 40 patients in three stages of ITP: exacerbation/relapse (n = 7), stable (n = 14) and remission (n = 19). Both IgG and IgM APLA to six target antigens were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: beta2-glycoprotein 1 (beta2GP1), cardiolipin, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine and factor VII/VIIa. The central finding was that APLA were common in ITP but differed significantly in disease stages, being highest in exacerbation (86% positive), intermediate in stable disease (57%) and lowest in remission (42%). In exacerbations, APLA were predominantly of IgG class, while in stable disease, IgM predominated. During remission, APLA often became undetectable. Both the frequency and titres of APLA were significantly higher during exacerbation than remission. An inverse correlation was found between platelet count and nearly all APLA (except beta2GP1). Sequential study of six patients revealed that APLA tended to emerge and rise with exacerbation, concurrently with new episodes of bleeding and became undetectable during remission. These findings raise the possibility that APLA may play a role in the exacerbation and remission of ITP or they may be a consequence of platelet destruction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available