4.6 Article

Effects of nutrient supply and below-ground herbivory by Diaprepes abbreviatus L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on citrus growth and mineral content

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 113-124

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.07.007

Keywords

root herbivory; plant nutrition; plant-herbivore interactions; C : N ratio

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-year-old citrus trees were grown in the greenhouse to study the effects of fertilizer concentration and root herbivory on plant growth and mineral concentration. In separate experiments, sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) and Swingle citrumelo (C. paradisi Macf. x Poncirus trifoliate L.) plants were treated with a complete fertilizer diluted to provide 25, 100, 200, or 400 ppm N and grown for 7 weeks with or without Diaprepes abbreviatus L. larvae. Increased fertilizer concentration increased the shoot mass and the shoot:root ratio of both sour orange and Swingle citrumelo. Root herbivory also increased the shoot:root ratio by depressing root growth more than shoot growth. Effects of root herbivory on growth were consistent across the four levels of fertilizer concentration, indicating that tolerance is not a function of nutrient status. For both rootstocks, concentrations of nitrogen in roots and leaves increased with fertilizer concentration, and C:N ratios decreased. In sour orange, root herbivory most strongly affected the concentration of carbon in roots, whereas in Swingle citrumelo, root herbivory most strongly affected leaf nitrogen. In general, herbivory reduced mineral concentrations of roots but the strength, and sometimes the direction, of herbivore effects varied significantly among fertilizer treatments. This research indicates that application of excess, balanced fertilizer is unlikely to offset growth reductions due to root herbivory by D. abbreviatus, and suggests that supplementation of specific nutrients may be of value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available