4.7 Article

Development of population-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 391-398

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.10.012

Keywords

SCID; newborn screening; TREC; T-cell receptor excision circle; T-cell maturation; early intervention; primary immunodeficiency; cost-effectiveness; bone marrow transplant; dried blood spots

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a treatable, inherited lack of cellular and Immoral immunity caused by diverse mutations in several different genes and leading to death in infancy unless immune reconstitution is provided. Currently no population screening exists for SCID, but early diagnosis would improve outcome. Objective: Because all patients with SCID make few or no T cells, we asked whether the absence of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), DNA episomes in newly formed T cells, could identify SCID regardless of genotype. Methods: DNA isolated from dried blood spots was assayed by real-time PCR to quantitate TRECs. Control PCR was performed on a segment of the P-actin gene. After pilot studies with adult and cord blood control subjects, blood from SCID patients was spotted onto filters and tested, followed by screening of actual blood spots from the Maryland Newborn Screening Program. Finally, newborn blood spots were recovered and tested from 2 infants after their diagnosis of SCID. Results: In contrast to filters from the newborn screening program, which had a mean of 1020 TRECs in two 3-mm punches, samples from 23 infants with SCID had < 30 TRECs. The newborn screening filter was retrieved from a state laboratory for one of these infants plus another infant who had died of SCID previously; although both samples had detectable R-actin DNA, neither had TRECs. Conclusion: TRECs are a stable analyte that can identify T-cell lymphopenia in newborn dried blood spots so that infants with SCID can receive early, life-saving treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available